Romhacks Bloody Roar: Extreme English Overhaul Patch (Nintendo Gamecube) Romhack
I'm trying that as we speak, you have to right click on the game in the list and click convert iso only works in the dev builds.
Spike
Newcomer
I know how to convert them but I don't get exactly the CRC needed 8eebe49c
Yeah me either
I have the correct .rvz ..... the patch(es) apply successfully, but each resulting patched file does not verify correctly in a no-intro .dat database
These are what are expected..
These are what are expected..
Bloody Roar - Primal Fury (Japan) [T-En by BloodRaynare & Sigma & TheFirstHunt v1.2] [Full Primal Xbox Cutscenes] [n] ...........(no-intro CRC : 43da1b23)
Bloody Roar - Primal Fury (Japan) [T-En by BloodRaynare & Sigma & TheFirstHunt v1.2] [Full Primal] [n] ............................................(no-intro CRC : 5563cfda)
Bloody Roar - Primal Fury (Japan) [T-En by BloodRaynare & Sigma & TheFirstHunt v1.2] [Partial Primal Xbox Cutscenes] [n] ......(no-intro CRC : 60e527d5)
Bloody Roar - Primal Fury (Japan) [T-En by BloodRaynare & Sigma & TheFirstHunt v1.2] [Partial Primal] [n] .......................................(no-intro CFC : 02a4cbb8)
Attachments
Last edited:
Hey Spike! This may have been a mistake on the site's part. It has built-in CRC-32/SHA-1 hash calculation, you just drag and drop your ISO/RVZ. But its result is different from Dolphin's own hash calculation, so I've just now replaced it with Dolphin's, which shows it's the same as the verified good dump. My bad! Feel free to send me a direct message too if you can't get it to work, I definitely want to help if you're trying to get versions for your site.
I'm not very knowledgeable in no-intro database verification. What does it need in order to verify? Could it be because you have them named Primal Fury instead of Extreme like the rest at the top? Sorry, I just don't understand how that works but I'd be more than happy to help if you explain it!
If you download the .rvz from Vimms it will be the correct crc when the file is extracted from the zip , it just that on Vimms it has the incorrect hash listed as they must of hashed the .zip file itself (with the included .txt file inside it) rather than the .rvz itself
I'm sorry, but I don't know what I'm looking for. It's a list of the ones that failed to verify, but I don't know what that means. What is it comparing them to? How does it know if they're verified or not verified?
Dolphin gives a non-reproducible result (can change depending on the build version), nkit2 is the way to go if you want reproducible results. The hashes on vimm site are the hashes of the original .iso file. I can also imagine that the xdeltas will be smaller when using it against the original .iso files, and that would remove the issue with different compression results in rvz. Anyone can compress it after being patched however they see fit.
The .xdeltas will likely be just as large due to the text in cutscenes actually just being part of the video file, meaning all of the videos have to be fully replaced by their English counterparts. But I agree, I think when I get some time to go back and re-do these (hopefully properly this time), I'll just do the standard ISO, and not use Dolphin. There's just so much about this stuff that I don't know, and this is also my first time making a patch this involved.